Search This Blog

Friday, December 3, 2010

Barking moonbat atheist explodes on youtube

On youtube I was repudiating a video by Rachel Maddow where she calls Americans stupid because there still resides in this once free land a small but growing majority of people who embrace Judeo Christian values and do not believe environmentalist propaganda. Well, I got into sort of a debate with one of the liberal God haters there. He claimed that religion was BS and that America was not supposed to be Christian that the founders were atheists. (funny, 10 years ago they called them bible thumping rich white folks now they are socialists and god hating hippies.)

Well After repudiating all of his points and throwing in some scripture, I was rewarded with a nice liberal diaglogue as follows:[NOTE: THE FOLLOWING IS EDITED FOR CONTENT WITH SPELLING AND GRAMMAR ERRORS INCLUDED]

YOUR **** RELIGION IS B****T AND YOUR GOD IS *%*&*% MAKE BELIEVE! I have exactly ZERO FEAR of what exists only in your rasist narrow simpleton mind. Your god is NOT AN OBJECTIVE REALITY and yet you keep pushing him on us. You are nothing but a bunch of stupid retarded bigots and hypicrites, PLEASE **$# OFF AND DIE. I am sick you your STUPID JEEEEEEESUS *%*&%* hijacking the legacy of the founding fathers to promote your controlling agenda. $&*^* YOUR STUPID &$&$* OF A GOD [long screed of swearing and curing and liberal slogans] ON YOUR IDIOT BI-BULL, IT BELONGETH IN DA TOILET! Are you so STUPID that you think quoting from theidiot BI-BULL will do anythimng besides make me LAUGH HYSTERICoLLY. The bi-BULL is a [more screaming and gibberish] that is good for nothing except wiping %&*^#. It is fiulled with STUPID, RIDICULOS errors and silly moronic fairy tales. It is the product of hateful rasist people. Its god is exclusive, racist, genocidal cunt of a monster whop loves only those who willingly ignore rational thought and become his sheeple. HE DOESN'T EXIST!

As you can see ladies and gentlemen, the liberals are still made that the Adults now control one half of one of the branches of government.

Proverbs 23:9 Do not speak to a fool, for he will scorn the wisdom of your words.

Proverbs 29:9 If a wise man goes to court with a fool, the fool rages and scoffs, and there is no peace

Proverbs 26:1As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour is not seemly for a fool.

Proverbs 26:4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.

proverbs26:7 The legs of the lame are not equal: so is a parable in the mouth of fools.

Proverbs 26:9 As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouths of fools.

Proverbs 26:10 The great God that formed all things both rewardeth the fool, and rewardeth transgressors.



Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Calstate Dems involuntarily commit the innocent and let homeless psycho killers run free

Two days ago, An elderly woman was murdered in front of her sister and onlookers on LA's metro gold line station in Little Tokyo. The station, recently opened a year ago under the new gold line extension into east LA now has its first big incident. An insane drug addicted and mentally ill homeless woman is now in custody for committing the murder.

The killer, a woman named Jackkqueline Pogue committed the offense has a long history of mental illness not to mention an even longer criminal history. She had been thrown out of just about every shelter and welfare housing in the city (which is surprisingly not uncommon given that these shelters and other facilities turn a blind eye to drug use and crime) and had a history of roaming LA's metro stations and trains panhandling and causing trouble.

Under California law including a newly expanded version of the LPS act, she was supposed to have been placed in involuntary commitment, institutionalized for a short period and then required to take medication and attend peer counseling.

That never happened.

In fact at least a year previous she assaulted an elderly man at Pershing square station and a Hispanic woman on the metro red line at Hollywood and Vine. The police did nothing. In fact on LAPD officer commented that nothing could be done anyway since she was mentally ill therefore she would get off easy. That still is no excuse. A woman is now dead thanks to their neglect. This should never have happened.

But the innocent are punished still...



This of course brings me to yet another tragedy. This week or maybe next when I get to it, I intend to publish an article on my blog and elsewhere about a high school graduate who was ready to start her adult life only to have it taken away from her by the state of California and mental health professionals.

Melinda Lee, The granddaughter of Chinese refugees who fled Mao Tse Tung's communist upheaval in China to Taiwan, then America and whose parents wound up embracing him had her whole life ahead of her when all of a sudden it was snatched away just a month after she graduated from High School. This woman had her whole life ahead of her... not anymore.

Melinda was forced into involuntary psychiatric commitment by her parents because according to them, she was awkward and peculiar. Doctors labeled her as having Asperger's syndrome, a form of mental social retardation that is also said to be related to autism. Doctors claimed she didn't fit in and was incapable of becoming an independent adult. All of this was conjecture and hear say. They based it on lies by the parents as well as their own biased opinions just because she was said to be nerdy.

Plenty of kids who are nerdy go on to accomplish great things! Think about people like Bill Gates for example. But no. Liberals want the government to butt in. To that end they make up a stupid disorder and then the government comes in, cancels the God given rights of our constitution and forces them to go through things THEIR way. As a result, poverty and disaster which is what always can be expected evertime government is in control.

Melinda had her whole future destroyed. She was not harmful to herself or anyone, she was an A student, she was a bright intelligent young woman ready to enter the world but instead she had that taken from her. In the coming week You will learn more about how liberalism destroyed her.

Meanwhile Jack Pogue gets to sleep on the streets of skid row, she gets thrown out of every shelter and SRO in the city, she goes around making trouble and nobody does anything! Add to this, California gives away several hundred dollars of your taxes to these people like Pogue for doing no work and they spend it on drugs. It all comes down to her killing an innocent old lady at a train station and only then is she arrested and detained. Unlike Melinda and others who are detained because liberals hate freedom and hate successful people.

Now of course I expect more debates to surface about terminating more of our God given liberties in the name of safety against mentally ill criminals. This despite as I mention already in a previous article Laws to that end already and always have existed, even if Hogue wasn't violent, the fact that she is mentally ill, homeless and unable to care for herself would have been enough for the state o come in and place her in the least restrictive setting possible. This as opposed to Nancy Pelosi putting Melinda Lee in an institution and drugging her into oblivion not to mention Nate Tseglin, a high school student who was institutionalized for being ostracized at school and because his parents were anti communist Russian refugees. Tseglin had a bright future but was drugged into oblivion and now suffers brain damage all thanks to Orange County Liberals.

Until we eject the liberals from the 3 branches of government and from the state assembly in California and other states, we will continue to suffer. So will innocent victims like melinda Lee and Nate Tseglin, and so will the victims and loved ones of violent psychotic homeless.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

New 2010 rankings on states best for business and careers (guess who's last)

Forbes Magazine recently released its annual statistics on best states for business and careers for 2010. In this tough economy and when looking for a place with good employment, it is a useful tool. The statistics were compiled by several business organizations including Moody's Economy.com Polling Corporate Real Estate Pacific Research Institute Tax Foundation Sperling's Best Places Better Government Association Census Bureau SBA FBI Dept. of Education and of course Forbes.

Both Private and public sectors came together and compiled this listing. The criteria used included the following: educational attainment, net migration, projected population growth, regulatory and tort climate, incentives, government integrity, transportation and bond ratings job income and gross state product growth as well as unemployment and presence of big companies, projected job, income and gross state product growth as well as business openings/closings and venture capital investments. The quality of schools, health, crime, cost of living and poverty rates were also included.

Those of you who are familiar with the listing on forbes as well as those who have read it on my blog will see some familiar faces both at the top and bottom of the list. Below is the ratings. The numbers on the left are current ranks, the right ones are last years rankings:

1 3 Utah
2 1 Virginia
3 5 North Carolina
4 4 Colorado
5 2 Washington
6 10 Oregon
7 8 Texas
8 6 Georgia
9 9 Nebraska
10 15 Kansas
11 7 North Dakota
12 11 Idaho
13 14 Iowa
14 12 Maryland
15 17 Minnesota
16 34 Massachusetts
17 16 South Dakota
18 29 Missouri
19 19 New Hampshire
20 21 Delaware
21 32 New York
22 23 Tennessee
23 36 Arizona
24 13 Montana
25 28 Alabama
26 18 Florida
27 22 Wyoming
28 31 Nevada
29 30 Indiana
30 33 Pennsylvania
31 43 Kentucky
32 26 Arkansas
33 20 Oklahoma
34 25 South Carolina
35 27 New Mexico
36 35 Connecticut
37 24 Illinois
38 37 Ohio
39 38 California
40 45 New Jersey
41 46 West Virginia
42 42 Alaska
43 48 Wisconsin
44 44 Louisiana
45 47 Vermont
46 39 Hawaii
47 49 Michigan
48 40 Mississippi
49 50 Rhode Island
50 41 Maine

The state of Utah beat Virginia out as best state for business. Salt Lake City and the rest of Mormon Country in particular the city of Provo have enjoyed a great deal of economic prosperity. Virginia's decline was probably due to the lost of manufacturing jobs along with upticks in violent crime in Richmond. Utah, with its pro capitalist business climate and strong foundations of moral, family and religious values were no doubt essential in its climb to the top. Say what you want about Mormon beliefs in general, its emphasis of family values without a doubt made this possible.

And just like in previous years, low tax small government republican conservative states such as Texas, Nebraska, Colorado, North Carolina ETC. have retained the top ten despite shrills from socialist Democrats that those are bad states with no taxes or programs for lazy slackers. Minnesota, Washington state and Oregon were the only Democrat states to remain on top. Don't expect it to last much longer.

The free state of New Hampshire remains at 19 near the bottom of the upper bracket due to an influx of communist Democrats fleeing the messes they made in Massachusetts, Maine, Rhode Island New York, California and elsewhere. They brought their anti freedom anti business beliefs with them and put them to practice, pulling The Free state downhill.

Surprisingly, The Peoples Socialist republic of Massachusetts made a steady climb up due to reforms by counter revolutionaries no doubt. All they need to do now is chuck out the unconstitutional insurance mandate and all will be well.

At the bottom of the list as always were the liberal states. All those states where liberal mantras of government knows best, for the children and for the greater good (always at the expense of your children and their greater good BTW) are put in practice and were liberty and freedom are disdained as racist Nazism, where socialism is all that's allowed and where your rights don't matter. Alaska is the only state of any kind of conservatism at the bottom. California which has embraced the European model is close to the bottom 10.

Not surprisingly the State of Maine which also embraces European leanings was dead last, bumping Rhode Island, another model of Europeanism in America off. Mississippi, long considered worst state in the union was behind that followed by the Europeanized state of Michigan which was the home state of Michael Moore.

Maine's decline is no doubt due to voter initiatives from Democrats asking for more taxing spending and borrowing. The value of the dollar has declined greatly in the state that has close to the biggest tax burden not to mention largest government administration in the nation due to constant borrowing to keep the mega beast alive. That, and demands by Maine's immoral majority to allow illegal aliens to vote, raise property taxes and the defeat of the Tabor (tax payer bill of rights) amendment last year for the 2nd time. Add to this, a lack of welfare reform and generous handouts to teenage moms with litters and dope fiends.

In addition, a growing number of gangs especially around the Portland Metro area, a massive increase in homelessness, even new taxes against vacationers such as what to do with your row boat!!

There is hope for Maine. The recent elections of republicans have given Maine and opportunity to come out of its hell hole and return the the traditional values of America and the free market. Let us hope and pray that this so. Its up to us to make sure our newly elected republican leaders have a backbone to stand for their convictions of freedom liberty and free markets against the tyranny of the socialist left.

Friday, November 5, 2010

march of liberal nazis or fascist moonbats protesting on parade

Yes folks, its what it is. Hitler would be proud.



Barack Obama New Deal economic stimulus Fail

The UN rights of the child in a nut shell and the coming UN police state



The truth behind the UN RIGHTS OF THE CHILD. What it really entails

1. First of all, the government (unelected in this case)will be the parent not you. Dont like it, you lose them.

2. Your child has a right to be forced to go to a communist indoctrination center (school) to be dumbed down, and conditioned to be a loyal marxist who will never question authority and grow up to be an illiterate factory worker

3. Your child has a right to grow up in a marxist country with no freedom of speech, freedom of the press and has the right to be sent to a holocaust style camp if he/she is suspected of evil thoughts like freedom or religion.

4. Your child has the right to be indoctrinated into becoming a pervert by other perverts and being forced to be brainwashed that that promiscuity and prostitution are acceptable.

Your child has a right to be a drug addict.

5.Your child has a right to be free of any mention of the word God other than a curse word. The right to be forced to remain godless under penalty of death

6. Your child has a right be forced into mandatory mental health screening run by communist doctors who will brand him/her mentally incompitent if does not agree with tenents of socialism in addition forced to take toxic drugs.

7. Your child has a right when they grow up to loose all the fruits of their labor for the greater good.

8.Your child has as right to grow up enslaved to the whims of the state in the name of the greater good and live in squalor and poverty just like all the other nations that are in lock step with the Socialist United Nations

9. Your child has a right to earn little while those in charge live off of them. They have the right to be euthanized by force when they become to old to work or are crippled.

ALL OF THIS IS FOR THE GREATER GOOD OF THE PEOPLE'S STATE AND ALL WORLD CITIZENS!

Just remember folks! If government can give it to you it can take it from you.

New videos by lee Doren Howtheworld works HTWW

Here are some fantastic videos by HTWW which BTW include a debate against cenk from the Young Turks. Despite being interupted by the moderator who is obviously a biased libtard, He did really well against his oppenent. Much to the dismay of liberals.















WE WIN!!! Almost!

Well we took back congress but we have a long way to go to take back america. If possible.

new videos of interest











GOP = the party of civil rights. Democrats = the party of white supremacy

I was recently emailed an article by Frank Ross called 15 questions for Democrats. It demonstrates some of the lies being told that republicans are racist. Reality check. Its the opposite. Liberals are racist


Which is the Real 'Racist' Party: Fifteen Questions for Democrats
Big Journalism
Posted by Frank Ross Feb 8th 2010



Once upon a time former Governor, Presidential candidate, and Chairman of the Democrat National Committee called the GOP the "White Party." CNN commentator Lou Dobbs took Dean to task for his language.

So was Dr. Dean, and those among the Left who share his understanding of history, accurate? Is the GOP the party of white people? Let's test the good doctor's diagnosis.



QUESTION: During whose administration did the signature of an African-American first appear on U.S. currency? During that of a Republican or a Democrat President?

ANSWER: In 1881, Republican President James A. Garfield appointed Blanche Bruce as Register of the Treasurer, making him the first African-American whose signature appeared on U.S. paper currency. In 1880, at the Republican National Convention in Chicago, when he received 8 votes for nomination as the party's vice presidential candidate, Bruce became the first African-American to win any votes at a major party's nominating convention.



QUESTION: Was the first African-American diplomat appointed by a Republican or a Democrat President?

ANSWER: In 1869, Republican President U.S. Grant appointed Ebenezer D. Bassett (1833--1908) as the first African- American ambassador representing the United States. He was Ambassador to Haiti.



QUESTION: Was the first African-American popularly elected U.S. Senator a Republican or a Democrat?

ANSWER: In 1966, Edward Brooke was the first African-American elected by popular vote to the U.S. Senate. He was a Republican Senator from Massachusetts.



QUESTION: During the late 1950's, William Monroe "Willie" Rainach, Sr., a Louisiana state legislator, led the "Massive Resistance" to desegregation in his state. Was Willie a Republican, or a Democrat?

ANSWER: "Willie" Rainach was a Democrat.



QUESTION: In 1957, nine African-American students attempted to enroll in Little Rock's Central High School. When they were barred entry by Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus, the President of the United States ordered federal troops to the school to assure their access to an education. Was Faubus a Republican, or a Democrat? Was that President a Republican or a Democrat?

ANSWER: Orval Faubus was a Democrat. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was a Republican.



QUESTION: In September 1962, U.S. Air Force veteran James H. Meredith enrolled as the first African-American student at the University of Mississippi. Governor Ross Barnett strongly opposed his entry into the school. Was Barnett a Democrat or a Republican?

ANSWER: Ross Barnett was a Democrat.



QUESTION: In 1965, the nation's eyes were focused on the Selma Voting Rights Movement and three Selma-to-Montgomery marches. Marchers were opposed by the White Citizens' Council and the Ku Klux Klan. On "Bloody Sunday," March 7, 1965, about 600 civil rights marchers left Selma and walked east. At the Edmund Pettus Bridge they were confronted and attacked by state troopers and sheriff's deputies. During this time, Theophilus Eugene "Bull" Connor, Alabama Public Safety Commissioner, became infamous for his brutal tactics against Civil Rights activists. Was "Bull" a Republican or a Democrat?

ANSWER: "Bull" Connor was a Democrat.



QUESTION: A sitting U.S. Senator once held the position of Exalted Cyclops in the Klu Klux Klan. Although he never served in the Armed Forces, he once wrote, "I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side." Of which party is he a member, Republican or Democrat?

ANSWER: Robert Byrd, Democrat Senator from West Virginia, is the longest serving Senator in U.S. history. Once upon a time he wore the white sheet and hood, but has since repented.



QUESTION: In the U.S. Senate's passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which political party had the highest percentage of its Senators vote for the Act? Republicans or Democrats?

ANSWER: 82% of the Republican Senators voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while 69% of the Democrat Senators voted "Yes."



QUESTION: Was the first female African-American Cabinet member appointed by a Republican or a Democrat President? (Trick question.)

ANSWER: Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and then Secretary of Education, was appointed to Democrat President Carter's Cabinet.



QUESTION: When you compare the makeup of the Cabinet members who served under Democrat President Jimmy Carter with the Cabinet members appointed by Republican President George W. Bush, which President appointed the highest percentage of African-Americans to his Cabinet?

ANSWER: Just 1 of the 21 persons Carter chose for his Cabinet, Patricia Harris, was an African-American, or 4.7% of his appointees. Of the 33 persons appointed by Bush to his Cabinet, 4 were African-Americans, or 12.1% (the same percentage reflected in our population). Bush's cabinet also included several other persons of color.



QUESTION: Was the first African-American popularly elected Governor a Republican or a Democrat?

ANSWER: Democrat Lawrence Douglas Wilder was the first African-American popularly elected as governor of a U.S. state. Wilder served as the 66th Governor of Virginia from 1990 to 1994. (Fair is fair.)



QUESTION: When was the race barrier broken with regard to the position of Secretary of State of the United States? Under a Republican or Democratic administration?

ANSWER: During the Republican administration of George W. Bush, Colin Powell became the first African-American Secretary of State. He was followed by Dr. Condoleezza Rice, also appointed by Bush, who was the first female African-American Secretary of State.



QUESTION: When was the race barrier broken with regard to the position of Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States Armed Forces? During a Republican or Democrat President's administration?

ANSWER: Republican President George H. W. Bush appointed General Colin Powell as Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1991. Earlier, Republican President Ronald Reagan appointed Powell as his National Security Advisor.



QUESTION: When the first African-American member of the U.S. Armed Forces engaged in action for which he was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, was the President at the time a Democrat or a Republican?

ANSWER: Sergeant William Harvey Carney (1840-1908) of the 54th Massachusetts Colored Infantry received the Medal of Honor for his actions during the Civil War Battle of Fort Wagner on July 18, 1863. The action of the 54th that day was depicted in the movie "Glory." The citation for his medal read:

"When the color sergeant was shot down, this soldier grasped the flag, led the way to the parapet, and planted the colors thereon. When the troops fell back he brought off the flag, under a fierce fire in which he was twice severely wounded."

The President was a Republican named Abraham Lincoln. Let's hope Dr. Dean was a better physician than he is an historian. As well as those who think like him.



"I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."
-President Lydon Baines Johnson, Democrat

"These negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they've never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness."
-President Jimmy Carter (1977-1981), Democrat

"I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."
-Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat

"I think one man is just as good as another so long as he's not a nigger or a Chinaman."
-President Harry Truman, Democrat

If you want You can read it here http://tinyurl.com/2aheyyo for yourself And lets not forget about several other beloved Democrats, Al Gore SR, who was also pro segregation, Strom Thurmond, who was Democrat at the time but upon having his eyes opened switched over and even admited that these southern democrats were hard core socialists. Then there FDR, the most beloved liberal president of all time and who interned the japanese and supported lynchings.

Aren't liberals tolerant and wonderful? THe mosquitos seem to think so...

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

OVER 300 POSTS!!!



Well no not really. I no longer live in Maine which IS hell. But New Hampshire is on its way to becoming like them thanks to an influx of Democrats from the surrounding communist bloc states.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Liberals attempt to rewrite history on the Boston Tea Party

In yet another attempt to assault the tea party movement, the left has a new weapon up its sleeve. A weapon its predecessors in totalitarian countries such as liberal Germany and liberal China have used frequently. Revisionist history. In this case it concerns an event in American history. the Boston Tea party. A revolt by colonists where a merchant ship carrying tea from the British East India company was seized and its cargo dumped overboard. This was all due to unjust taxation by British Parliament thousands of miles away. Taxation without representation as our founders put it which was considered an act of tyranny.

But not according to liberal historians. According to the far left these patriots were NOT protesting against unjust taxes but were protesting a TAX CUT. That's right! You heard that correctly, the revolutionary war, the tea party, ETC. were because those capitalist stooges in Britain voted to cut every one's taxes rather than spread the wealth around for the greater good.

AND DON'T FORGET TO THINK OF THE CHILDREN!! CHILDREN! CHILDREN! CHILDREN! CHILDREN!

The founding fathers evidently weren't very much those old white slave owning liberty loving capitalist dogs the liberals make them out to be. They were commie pinkos who wanted to take things away from you for the greater good.

This is history to a liberal...

But let us go back to the real world. What really did happen. What is it that the leftists leave out?

Well to start with what happened was it was NOT a tax cut that parliament voted for. More of a tax shift. This is by the way a very cunning tactic used by liberals in many places when trying to pacify blue collar and other Democrats who worry about heavy tax burdens effecting the economy and their standard of living. In Maine where I am originally from, Governor Baldaci The Bolshevik tyrant that has run our state to the ground for a decade used this tactic frequently. He would cut Income taxes while raising sales taxes and other taxes or at times tax cut here and tax hike elsewhere. The leftist media would then cover it up act like there was no shift while making ad hominem attacks on capitalists who opposed it.

Barack Obama has done the same thing. His economic plan to raise taxes while letting Bush's teeny tiny tax cuts expire is called a tax cut for middle class families. In reality no one's taxes are being cut. They are in fact being raised and the big companies WILL pass the buck to those of us the consumers.

The same tactic was used to attack Bush when he attempted his tax cuts. In reality what happened was Democrat legislatures in state and city levels hiked taxes cancelling out Bush's tax cuts. Only Middle American states with low taxes and smaller governments enjoyed any prosperity during the last decade. Sadly, the liberal dominated media turned THAT around and covered THAT up.

But getting back on topic, British parliament Did exactly that. Tax shift. NOT Tax cut. You see it all started when a gigantic conglomerate called The British East India company reported that its revenues and profits were in deep decline. This primarily due to competition from smaller shipping companies. The company riled up parliament with fears of economic hardships if it did not do anything to help.

Well, just like big companies in our time, the British East India Company HAD bought off much of Parliament. Not to mention, the house of lords. So that along with cries of the sky is falling helped make it possible for Parliament to pass the Tea act which GAVE The British East India company a special exemption on tariffs and duties for shipping. Not only that, a tax cut.

This act for all intensive purposes was a precursor to a favorite pass time of liberals called corporate welfare as well as Keynsianism.

According to Supporters, it would drive down costs of tea all while discouraging smugglers. Just like how stealing 800 billion from overburdened taxpayers was supposed to be helpful to OUR economy. Both were lies.

In reality, the tea act was harmful to local shipping companies which were NOT exempt from these fees and taxes and faced bankruptcy. In those days Bankruptcy also usually meant imprisonment for many years in a debtors prison or forced service in The army or Navy. The price of tea meanwhile remained the same all while The British East India company wallowed in cash.

At the same time Parliament dramatically increased policing of smuggling and forbade colonists to buy any other tea except from the British East India Company. Overall, the result was an ACTUAL TAX INCREASE on the most basic of items of some 50-60%. So, no, it really wasn't a tax cut that the colonists were protesting. More over it was the opposite. That and corporate welfare.

TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION IS TYRANNY!



These words were uttered by our forefathers more than 2 centuries ago first by the reverend Jonathan Mayhew then by Patrick Henry and James Otis. These were words that were the spark for revolution against an unjust ungodly and tyrannical government thousands of miles away that imposed the will of a tiny aristocratic oligarchy who ruled without consent of the governed.

To Liberal socialist Democrats, especially the royal aristocratic elite in congress and the Senate those words are considered the uttering of right wing nuts and racists. The ideas of individualism, free speech, economic liberty freedom of religion the right to bear arms ETC. these are all abhorred by liberal democrats whose stranglehold of power is kept enforced by a population of sloths, addicts, and those who view wealth and prosperity as a form of theft and liberty and freedom a form of white supremacy and racism.

Today the tyrannical government our forefathers fought against lies not thousands of miles and a continent away but on our own shores in Washington and in our state capitols and city halls. A government that takes away the fruits of our blood sweat and tears and gives it away to sloths, drug addicts, felons and corporate cheats just to name a few. Along with government employees who make millions with the backing of unionist thugs and blackmailers. Our government punishes success and initiative and targets the innocent while giving mercy and compassion to the under serving who if pampered will continue to be a cancerous growth to our nation.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Socialist take over of psychiatry

I have been away for 3-4 months from my blog and I had a lot of articles I wanted to publish. For one, The anniversary of the Mutiny on the Bounty was around that time and a friend of mine who is a historical scholar was going to help write an interesting article about mutiny and include some facts about Captain William Bligh and the bounty crew that is not generally known. He would cut away some of the fiction and non fiction that sadly has seeped in thanks to popular fiction and Hollywood influence.

I was also going to discuss the so called theory about death panels and how sure enough, Obama care will be rationing medicine and denying life saving treatment to people who are perceived as being useless and a social burden. Also, I was going to show more articles about SSI scams against about the collapse of Social security and California liberals invading free states with their failed Marxist policies that ruined their home state.

However I felt compelled to bring up an issue I have been taken to task about which concerns psychiatry. In a lot of my articles I have written about abuses involving the mental health system. I have been accused of being a Scientologist even by those in conservative forums for my attacks against psychiatry.

Well let me be frank, I am not an opponent of psychiatry. I do not deny that mental illness exists, ETC I certainly am not a scientologist.

But...

I am against psychiatrists making up disorders and diseases out of thin air without physical proof. At the APA for example they simply take a vote and boom! The illness exists.

I am against psychiatrists using traits and distinctions that have nothing to do with mental state and nothing to do with anything neurological. Some psychiatrists diagnose people as mentally defective simply because they were victims of persecution or because of religious or political beliefs.

With that in mind I want to point out that as I detest such diagnosing of mental illness on such absurd grounds, what is even more absurd is that such diagnosis OF a mental illness that freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the constitution should be suspended for such as person diagnosed.

It is the later that I and others who have been involved in the anti-psychiatry movement have been most concerned about. Those of you who have followed my blog for the past two plus years are aware of atrocities that have resulted from abuse at the hands of mental health officials. SSI scamming, guardian abuse being the worst of these atrocities. Not to mention defending abusive relatives.

With that in mind, these same individuals most of whom are perfectly healthy and productive members of society are persecuted by leftist doctors while those who are truly in need of treatment and intervention are ignored.

Just a few months ago I took a trip to Los Angeles, one of the homeless capitols of the country. (California in of itself is a homeless capitol. A testament to the welfare state and illegal immigration.) While there were plenty of people who were out on the streets because they were down on their luck, I noticed many of them were visibly demented and deranged. Downtown I saw homeless people who were talking to themselves and invisible people (in English AND Spanish.)

I noticed a man who had white and red make up with crosses on his face who was singing and shouting Christian hymns and oldies. He looked like a clown. I saw an old woman who was cursing on the side walk. In Hollywood, I saw crackheads and other insane people. I recalled an incident in Modesto where a woman who was living independently was declared bipolar, sterilized and had her assets confiscated not to mention similar cases. Surprisingly, these doctors left skid row and the Streets of LA Hollywood and elsewhere untouched.

Men and women who are a threat to themselves and others, who are clearly incapable of caring or feeding themselves, who are living on the streets are ignored. Elderly and ordinary citizens however are targets of communist minded psychiatrists who are after their assets and property isolating, medicated and robbing them then dumping them on the streets.

Psychiatry itself is not the problem. The problem is the socialist worldview that has crept into the practice for over a century; the abhorrence of property rights and the rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness and in its place a collectivist dictatorship run either by a single tyrant or multiple tyrants elected or otherwise or a tyranny of 51% or more of people who are childish, selfish and naive. Here is were Rob Hubbard and the Scientology church fails in finding the errors of psychiatry. It is not psychiatry itself but socialism.

Monday, August 2, 2010

THE OBAMA DECEPTION (MUST SEE!!)



MUST SEE FULL LENGTH MOVIE!!!

Other cool videos







New videos from Howtheworldworks Lee Doren



Story of cosmetics the critique



Journalists and Sherrod



Crisis of capitalism THE CRITIQUE



NAACP Racist resolution

Whats happening on Mainestategop

IM BACK! YES! I got married 2 months ago and have spent the past couple of months on honeymoon not to mention working on my business. I HAVE kept up with things elsewhere but have neglected the blog. There is a lot I want to share.

First, it turns out some liberalfascist goons hacked into my youtube account and deleted most of my videos. This should serve as proof of the nazilike tendencies of liberals. They hate our freedom and want us badly to become another despotic regime under their failed marxian system.

Second, I am now on Twitter, face book and have posted some comments recently on Huffington post, the leftist news forum. I have also been on Mark Fiore's website challenging the marxists there on their views.

Third, I have several articles planned out such as dealing with the Obama administrations failing on the BP oil spill, a liberal plot to use the spill to seize BP assets in a nazilike fashion and to do the same to others in order to bring about state property. Also I have articles detailing guardian abuse in Illinois, Obama's home state and one of the most socialistic. As well as SSi scaming and pilfering and the economic downturn we have been facing since Obama's election.

Monday, May 24, 2010

The all new smarter better Big Government



A brief video Based on Mark Fiore's smarter than you. A government that wont fudge up America. Certainly wont ruin our economy.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Failure of government health and nutrition mandates

A little something I would like to add on in light of government health mandates and the government failing. (not surprisingly) This concerns the failure of role of government as nutritionist.



Some of you who are old enough may remember old cartoons and commercials from your local dairy council and other nutrition advocates that were shown in the 70s and 80s as well as commercials from Bush the first's presidential council of physical Fitness that premiered on Nickelodeon advertising healthy living, exercise and nutrition.

The kind of nutrition advertised 30 to 20 years ago would be balked at today however. In the 80s and up until the late 90s the ideal diet was a diet of 5 servings of fruits and vegetables and a diet low in fat. (Not just animal and vegetable fat mind you but every kind of fat there is.) As well as a diet high in carbohydrates. You heard that right. The food pyramid of that era stated that we needed mainly a diet of grain cereal oatmeal and from it carbohydrates which was thought to be energy.

Today we know now that carbohydrates are as deadly as what we now call bad cholesterol. But it was not known then. As a result, obesity rates spiked. America became the fattest nation in the world. What was thought to be a crisis of calories and fat was really stemming from the advice our government, thought to know what is best was giving us. And the fed us the wrong information.

Carbohydrates it turns out was complex sugars that lowered metabolism, stored fat lay out bad cholesterol in your arteries and made cancer causing free radicals. Enter David Atkins and his Atkins diet which turned nutrition and the food pyramid upside down. Now, it was eating more meat and less grain. This diet though partly correct also fell flat.

Today government is sweeping its errors under the rug and advertising a new pyramid. Eat more vegetables and fruits cut out grain and meat as well as sweets. The liberals no doubt used their clout to advertise the cut back on meat in favor of animal rights activism. Still, it shows we can't always be dependent on government.

Today America still suffers obesity. The government is still advertising on media and in schools the above mentioned wisdom. Though one wonders if there may still be errors in what is being fed us by our government. worldnetdaily writer Doctor Arthur Robinson, Ph.D., explains more on how the government is corrupting science in his article. We highly recommend this and others for future reference as well as a similar article by Chuck Norris on government intrusion into how we eat.

Ray Stevens: Illegal immigration illegal everywhere but the USA



If you're thinking about illegal immigration be careful because in some nations breaking the law is frowned upon. IMAGINE THAT!

But as Ray Steven's new video points out, Its only racist when illegal immigration is banned in the USA. In fact we must reward them at our expense!

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Lee Doren on the Leslie Marshall show

Chef Ramsay, animal rights activists, envirowackos and communists want to mess up your kitchen and control your food.

In an article I posted on my blog and expanded on freerepublic I mentioned that Chef Gordon Ramsay demanded that government establish dietary standards and force people to eat what THEY thought was best and to punish them through taxes and other means. In particular he attacked parents of obese children. Many of these children in fact suffer from other problems genetic or organic that lead to their obesity.

For those unfamiliar, Gordon Ramsay is a world class chef and celebrity known for outbursts and a short temper as well as a filthy mouth. Lately he has also begun to show political clout demanding that government become every one's head chef. A politician running your kitchen essentially.

This mentality that government should control our food has also come out even more elsewhere from the liberal media. Time Magazine for example advocated government control over farms to curtail meat production and to focus more on organic growing. It decried meat production as unsanitary harmful and a cause of global warming and that we must go vegetarian for the sake of the environment.

I have come across similar arguments in other news sites and even in magazines. The articles reeked of animal rights activism and the myth of global warming. Environmentalists and their political allies want to butt into your kitchen and dictate what you can eat and when. The biggest arguments used involves the environment and global warming. The articles claimed that producing meat produces greenhouse gas not only from the animals themselves but in cooking them as well. Calls ranging from heavy taxes on meat to mandates for organic farming.

While it is true that some of the livestock in America could be raised and bred better, the solutions exclaimed by liberals would only make matters worse. Mandates for organic farming and raising taxes would lead to rising costs for food. Time Magazine even admitted that such policies meant we would have to sacrifice and tighten our budget for the sake of cows and the environment since organic food is more expensive. Not only that, environmental controls proposed all because of the unproven theory of global warming would cause food costs to jump even higher. Even the price for non organic food would jump.

The New York Times featured a similar article by MARK BITTMAN using similar slogans. Not only that comparing American meat consumption to oil consumption. Bittman, a vegan portrayed the American meat industry in a negative light. Not only that exaggerating the energy cost of meat as well that the fecal waste is bad for the environment and even COOKING IS BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT! In other words, simply BBQing a steak on your Weber is ruining the earth's ecosphere! NUTS!

The impact of following the environmental gurus and the socialists is worse than can be imagined. While wealthier countries would be eating less the 3rd world impact would be much worse. In fact the majority of starvation going on in the world whether in Indonesia or in Africa can be attributed to environmentalism. Children in Africa starve because they are not allowed to use pesticides to kill locusts that eat much of their crops. Not only that, many are dying from malaria infected mosquito's. Then there's the animal rights activism in India that has lead to over a third of lost food from rats and insects. In addition, Brazil and other countries are preventing grazing and planting for the sake of the rain forest. While it can be said that the loss of the rain forest is not so good, the policy of halting grazing and planting all together is even worse. That's not all. This as well as government subsidies for ethanol and synthesized fuels (Which liberals whine still create global warming.) Has inflated food prices in the third world.

The United Nations and the liberals however don't want to hear about it. In fact they want even more controls over our food supply. Controls that are eerily similar to what happened in Russia and China in the last century. This was when Stalin launched is 5 year plan to seize farm land and establish state control over food and when Mao did something similar with is great leap forward which converted farm land into industrial zones. All in all the 5 year plan was a five year failure and the Great leap forward was a great leap backward. Scores of millions died of famine and millions more were killed for resisting or suspecting of resisting. That and Both Mao And Stalin scapegoated others to deflect blame and had them killed. This has always resulted when the state controls food. But Liberals don't care. they want more control.

And it is already happening right now EVEN IN THE UNITED STATES. For the past century, American farmers many of whom used to be independent have lost their independence and even their farms. Big corporations have also used this opportunity thanks to support from big government to create an unopposed monopoly which if it continues could bottle neck the supply and inflate prices. Farms have also been under attack from massive local and federal regulations and taxes. Then there's health regulations. Bans against trans fat foods for example which may or may not be good for you. Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats have also used the new Obama care mandate and their power grip to regulate food as well.

According to Worldnetdaily commentator Bob Unruh, Obama and Democrats passed several bills that would also ban salt in food (Even though new evidence proves it might not be that bad for you.) And have passed through the house a bill that would set up new fees and regulations that would bankrupt farms, supermarket chains and suppliers creating a food shortage and higher costs. H.R. 2749: Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 Would set up unnecessary unsound regulations that would regulate your food based on unscientific health findings. It could lead to a catastrophe similar to the famine in the Ukraine during the 1930s. All because of the false theory of global warming and for the sake of animal rights.

Other food regulations have cropped up quietly. For example Santa Clarita California is banning toys in fast food meals and Michelle Obama under her own liberal guilt is establishing a child hood obesity task force that wants to tax deserts. Not only that Democrats want the FCC to ban advertisements for meat and what they consider to be junk food.The liberal socialists are just getting started and already it looks as though America will be going hungry for sure. All for the sake of animal welfare, and so called global warming.

In light of these facts it shows once more, government doesn't know what's best. Especially in light of farming and nutrition. But the communist Democrats don't want to hear about it. It looks as though we will see famine here in America. Something unheard of till now all because of government regulation.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

New movies defending Capitalism by HTWW







Barking moonbat theater presents: Letters from a leftard

The following are from a series of letters that came from a youtube viewer named sherkey. A liberal nut job if ever there was.

You mean Bush that took a surplus from Clinton and tore up the country to financial ruin.that Bush. The one that did not have the honesty to keep war spending in the federal budget , but rather put it in a emergency supplemental bill that Bush who allowed schools, mosques and fir houses to be built in Afghanistan and Iraq While New Orleans burned. That Bush that did not have the balls to raise taxes for the two silly wars we were in, but borrowed from China, again and again and again. That Bush who signed a new prescription drug benefit that was not funded. that Bush who ignored pay as you and deficit neutrality that Clinton did to make a surplus. that Bush was declared business bankruptcy twice in his lifetime and went Harvard business school and still had huge deficits. Reagen = large deficits
Bush I = huge deficits
Bush Baby II= massive, massive deficits all on his watch

Little child, stand on the side of the road and let progressices run the country. If people wanted to get rid of social security, unemployment and medicaid, they would have voted in huge majorities of republicans again and again, but what happened democrats have enjoyed that luxury

Good luck teaturd and Drill baby Drill
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH

That is so funny, you told me to spell correctly and you misspell yourself HAHAHAHHAHAHA

As opposed to Reagan 10.8% Unemployment double digit unemployment, and quadrupled the deficit, (you spelled deficit, deficient hahaha)

As opposed to Reagan who actually made millions of illegal aliens, American citizens in 1986 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

As opposed to The Bush clowns and Reagan who gave trillions and trillions to farmers for their crack welfare payments and their votes HAHAHAHAHA

As opposed to Reagan and the Bushes who failed to win the war of terror and drugs (ie crackheads like you ) HAHAHAHAHAHA and Bush baby II who took crack cocaine before he was 40. he was for it before he was against it HAHAHAHAHHA

Obama signed into law Guns in national parks, No republican can say that HHAHAHAHA

Reagan giving chemical weapons to Iraq early 1980's (Saddam Hussein) HAHAHAHA

Reagan = Selling arms to Iran, see Iran Contra our mortal enemy HAHAHAHAHAHA

Bush 1 and 2 like Reagan created massive massive deficits

Jimmy carter = A stump of a fool like the two Bushes and Reagan HAHAHHAHAHAHA

If the majority of Americans wanted no social programs like Social security, unemployment and Medicaid, they would have kept in republican majorities for a long long time Guess what? they did not HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

mainestategop = dumba**


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one, but he is in praise that Obama signed a law allowing guns in National parks

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat, but he pokes his business into other peoples business, ie, The FISA act, and gay marriage

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks of ways to skew the intelligence i.e Weapons of mass Destruction

A liberal (Obama like Reagan, ) brings Russia to the table and reduces nuclear arsenals and takes his time and decides the surge in Afghanistan will work and does


If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly bangs the door stalls ie Larry Craig (R) Idaho, and Mark Foley (R) Florida uses government computers quietly to solicit homosexual activities

If a black man and Hispanic are conservatives, they see themselves as independently successful, and uses the RNC general fund to go to strip clubs and spend money for conventions in Hawaii.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about Limbaugh who broke the law doctor shopping, and Nixon who broke thousands of laws.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he only watches fox news channel, and limits himself and the same fox news who are biased and set up the 912 project that is the Teabbagers org.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he becomes a democrat and believes in Jefferson separation between church and State


If a conservative decides he needs health care, and he is 65 years and older, he gladly puts his hands out for his social security and Medicaid. If he loses his job, he appreciates the unemployment that he gets from the Government.

If a Conservative is a farmer, 100% of farmers are conservative, he gladly accepts the welfare handouts that are in the trillions and trillions, while condemning the poor and minorities that get the welfare also
Fair enough on the spelling. You know you mentioned Libraries.......This is another taxpayer funded enterprise so you see government can work outside of the constitution. libraries are not mentioned in the Constitution so this social idea works out fine, agree?

If Government has no business in marriage, especially gay marriage, then Government has no business telling women what hey have to do with their bodies. that is why Roe V Wade is there, and I see that the republicans did not do anything to overturn it.

To me, anyone can exercise their first Amendment rights as far as parades are concerned, if this means having parades like the Irish, the Italians and the Mexicans do as well.

Reagan, granted did good in bringing Russia to the bargaining table, but can you praise Obama for doing the same thing last week?

As far as people getting their news from whatever ideology, to each its own, but if you just watch fox news then it is slanted. Are MSNBC and CNN slanted? Of course, but it is wise to shuffle through all the slanted stuff that ALL news does and seek the truth.

Sorry Fox news is slanted, because who sets up the 912 project? Glen beck and that becomes biased news. Sean Hannity, Neil Cavuto advertising the April 15th teabag project and then going live on April 15th last year at the teabag party that are only opposed to Obama. That is very very slanted. What if MSNBC did that or CNN, you would accuse them of slanted journalism. Also do you really think these newscasters care? No because, all they do is sell their wares and junk non stop to the teabaggers. If CNN or MSNBC newscasters sold their liberal crap, you would go off the head..

you cannot tell me there is a difference between welfare for the poor and welfare for the farmer? You generalize when you talk about the 8 kids that some one of color has. Welfare reform done in the 1990's by the republicans and Clinton gave them a 5 year window in their lifetime, and I am alright with that. the only difference is that generations of farmers love that crack welfare. there is no difference. period and taxes do not paint the picture. I am talking about the farmers who have distain for liberal governments but are not principled enough to send the money given to them back. that is hypocrisy plain and simple.


You say Social security is bankrupt. I remember All Gore talk about a lock box, and you all laughed at him and bush raided it and took a lot out. His policies that have got us into the depression in the first place did away with all the jobs that always put money into it. Bush = no lock box.

Also you lament about the government going bankrupt. bush funded the war by not raising taxes, and borrowed heavily from China to be precise. Bush kept the $2.3 trillion debt of the war outside of the federal process, i.e the emergency supplemental . Obama took that and put all the emergency supplemental into the actual federal budget for the first time thus raising the government debt in the federal budget.
You say families and churches need to be involved? Are you kidding me. Of course your Christian ideology leaves out atheist who are Americans also. typical reasoning. You people on the right do not believe in abortion, but you are all unwilling to help the ghettos of America deal with this problem. You say " the farmers work for a living as opposed to the 30 year old slut grandmothers and their 8 bastard kids with bastard litters of their own who refuse to work" Again, you oppose abortion, but condemn them and give them nothing. You say also "Families and churches need to be involved?" that worked out well in the States that got hit bad with hurricane katrina. bushes non response to katrina proved that that crap of families and churches do not work but the federal government has to be involved also. look at the flooding in the midlands currently. national Guard units and federal departments like homeland security are involved. please tell those people to just rely on their families and churches. tell then not to rely on rescue workers from FEMO and the helicopters, and boats and emergency medical tents set up to help the citizens.

You did not complain when the same government you do not want to help your fellow Americans spent billions building mosques, schools, and firehouse in Iraq and Afghanistan and the handing out of American taxpayer dollars to the warlords to bribe them. i would rather have waste spending it on Americans by Americans instead of over there too people who will always hate our guts. You see theocracies do not work over there and you want that to be the law of the land here in the United States.

You talk about China and we will become a fiefdom? Well thanks Bush for borrowing trillions and trillions from them. The gulags and stripped pajamas scare tactics you mention always, do not work as your kind tried that in the 1950's ala McCarthyism and it will not work now.


You say that I will have guilt because of what is happening? Why should I? I think the guilt is on your side. the hypocrisy that your side shows is quite amusing. I saw the Searchlight protest. the signs say "hands off my Medicare"? What ? So you accuse the government of socialism but yet you continue to take SS, unemployment and use Medicaid monthly? How is this principled? It is not. I would have more respect for your side when you turn back in all those social programs you denounced with your silly teabagger protest

you mean the illegal immigrant that Reagen naturalized? All those years that have passed by and the American people could have voted republican teabaggers in for as Rove said a permanent majority. Guess what you had power 1994-2006. You did not repeal those social programs such as social security, unemployment and medicare and only tackled sill y things like the Terry sciavo incident. You were immature and get drunk wit power. that is why for decades Americans have voted in democratic majorities. If they wanted change they would have kept you in power. guess what? They did not. Also drudge reports had a piece that 80% of teabaggers under the age of 65 years of age are taking unemployment checks. Go stand to the side clowns while this great President takes care of business.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Bear in mind folks THIS is the kind of constituency we have in America that voted for Obama. We are in serious trouble. Can't even spell right to.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Howtheworldworks Lee Doren exposes fraud and failure in stimulus bill

As it turns out the administration of Obama lied about the numbers and it turns out the stimilus wasted our money while producing no new jobs.




FACEBOOK:
http://www.facebook.com/LeeDoren1

WEBSITE:
http://www.LeeDoren.com

Stimulus:
http://tinyurl.com/29fz3zv

Dianne Feinstein:
http://tinyurl.com/28ftau2



5,571
views 5,571
views HowTheWorldWorks — April 21, 2010 — TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/LDoren FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/Lee... WEBSITE: http://www.LeeDoren.c... HowTheWorldWorks — April 21, 2010 — TWITTER:
http://www.twitter.com/LDoren

FACEBOOK:
http://www.facebook.com/LeeDoren1

WEBSITE:
http://www.LeeDoren.com

Cooking the Books: http://tinyurl.com/y4gk2e6

Carjacking: http://tinyurl.com/29475mf

Global Warming Video Removed: http://tinyurl.com/27uueve

Gangster Gov't: http://tinyurl.com/y4yg9q6

Who knew what?: http://tinyurl.com/y2nlx79

Media Keep Out: http://tinyurl.com/y29ntuy

Are They Racist?: http://tinyurl.com/27tzrdw

Donny Deutsch of Air?: http://tinyurl.com/29aaguj

Ban Salt: http://tinyurl.com/y2kstzt

Monday, May 3, 2010

Welcome Back, Carter



The right to vote is more of a responsibility.

THis is a article I wrote 2 years ago. I thought I'd touch it up a bit in light of the elections coming up and in light of what's been going on.

A week ago I was at McDonald's ordering lunch. It was very busy and there was a large crowd present. I ordered the food and waited around for a few minutes. While I was doing so, a manager and another crewmemeber were getting ready to put the flags up on the pole. The manager showed him how to fold the flags up and they folded up old glory into a nice triangle with loving and patriotic care. While they were folding the McDonald's flag, a funny looking woman in her thirties with two tots in a carriage walked up to the counter where the US flag was and exclaimed in a squeaky and stupid voice, "Oh! That lookth jutht like the flag they give to famlieth of veteranth after Bush sendth them to die in Iraq and take away their benefits!"

Everyone nearby looked at her for awhile and then paid no attention to her. I began to ask myself, just where is the father of her kids and what does she do for a living anyway? From what I gather this dingbat is another one of Maine's many welfare recipients who can't amount to anything and are either too poor or too stupid to leave to get a better job and instead cancel out my vote and suck on the tit of Maine's enormous government. This woman was completely ignorant that the reason we are scaling back veterans benefits is to make way for massive social programs for lazy bums and housing projects filth like her who are idiots. I started to imagine just how the kids are going to grow up and cancel out the votes of my own children as well.

With that in mind I began to lay out the plans for this essay and thought, its time we go back to making voting a responsibility and a privilege rather than a right. One of my writers pointed out an 18th century quote from an English gentleman named Edmund E Blackadder the 3rd that sums it up:

Blackadder: Give stinking morons like Baldrick the right to vote and we'll all be back to worshiping druids, death by stoning and eating dung for dinner.

Baldrick:Oh! I'm eating dung for dinner tonight actually.


Blackadder:It hardly does sound fair, Look at Manchester, population 6000 electorial roll 5. Not a lot of people can vote, Women, peasants, the insane, lords...

Baldrick: That's not true, Lord Nelson has a vote!

Blackadder:HE HAS A BOAT BALDRICK! NOT A VOTE!


In addition, one Lord Melchett (Or was it the Duke of Wellington?) Had this to say:

Give them an inch and they'll take a foot, maybe a leg.

Jokes aside there is some meaning in this. If we continue to allow people who are uneducated, immoral lazy byproducts of government schooling, secular humanism and pop culture to vote, we will be going bankrupt and have less freedom than we have now. Its already happening. The politicians and judges we elect share the same sentiments as the people before mentioned.

Long ago in America the founding fathers, men from different backgrounds were political and philosophical geniuses who recognized the necessities of religion, morality and responsibility and freedom against tyranny and dependence on government. They did little to debate on who should be eligible to choose their leaders. There were certain regulations in some states such as the poll tax and literacy tests but it was found that they were biased towards certain groups and they didn't last. One of my friends pointed out debates on other blogs that only those who pay taxes who are not mentally incompetent or of certain privilege be allowed to vote but also pointed out that Pelosi and Obama could use that to make conservatives ineligible to vote and take over the courts, the congress, the senate and oval office and drive this country to the ground. Just keep raising taxes and have the American psychiatric Association define conservatism, defenders of the constitution and opponents of large government and taxes to be a mental disorder and that's that.

There is naturally a better way to sort it out. Sensible solid criteria that can be given out to filter out those who are moral, educated and responsible from those who are corrupt, immoral and ignorant regardless whether they are rich and poor. Criteria I have mulled about. Bear in mind they are just proposals. I am not saying this is exactly how it should be done but close to it.

First of all, recipients of welfare, and government subsidies as well as certain people who work for the government should be excluded. If you are a single mother with 12 bastards living in public housing, you should not get to vote. Get a job, a husband, get your act together, and put some of your brats up for adoption then you can vote. If you are a business executive, CEO, manager, or executive of a company that receives subsidies, no vote. Get your act together, plow more of your profits into your companies and hire more workers, create more innovations and then you can vote again. In some cases employees can be exempted. If you are a case manager, bureaucrat, agent or politician, no votes for you. You can keep your job and work for the taxpayers, or you can get a new job and vote again.

This should also apply to others on the government payroll. Police officers, Firemen, doctors in state hospitals or beneficiaries of Obamacare, teachers, public defenders, judges, District attorneys ETC. You are receiving taxpayer money to do a job for we the people. You are receiving funds from our hard work. We don't trust you to vote for politicians who will give you a raise while our cities and communities are in the pits. We the people will decide if you deserve a raise. Also government employees should either be banned from forming unions or their unions should be severely regulated since they are getting their money from taxpayers, many of whom are in the rears.

The only exception I believe to this rule is the military. These men and women are doing more than receiving money they are putting their lives on the line to stay free. We don't want uneducated lazy parasites taking from defense to fund their laziness. Also some exceptions should be made for recipients of SSI and SSDI. Mainly elderly voters. Although it would depend on many factors. Then again its best to leave that alone.

Second of all people who are evil and corrupt should not be allowed to vote. I recall Sean Hannity interviewing college kids in Marxist universities who don't know a damn thing about how the world works. They know nothing about history, they don't even know what happened on December 7th or what the constitution says. They do believe that socialism is best, that 80% of the wealthiest Americans (Or for that matter anyone who works) Should be taxed redistributed to those who won't work, they believe that no one should be allowed to protest or publish without government approval, they believe religion is a mental disorder and that anyone who does not agree with them in even the tiniest way is a racist sexist fascist Nazi who should be put to death. I believe an written exam on the Constitution should be in order for these people. Immigrants and new citizens must learn it to become citizens. Those born citizens should understand how America works before taking up a ballot.

People from other countries such as Mexico, Brazil, China, the Ukraine, Poland, Germany, Japan, Algeria, Yemen, Portugal, Britain and Togo land and who become citizens are required to know, and many of these people go on to becoming outstanding citizens in the community. Meanwhile our own children grow up stupid, lazy and the most they can land is cleaning up puke, flipping burgers and mopping aisles. These kids who work retail use cash registers that tally up numbers for them since they are too stupid to count add and subtract, paid for by us thanks to Public school. Yet they get to vote for idiots who ruin our nation.

Again, one possibility should be a test given before anyone can register to vote. The test will be a sensible one, multiple choice. You need to know about how the government works, how our constitution works, why we have the freedom we have ETC. People who support gun control, speech codes, protest zoning, socialism, compulsory public schooling won't be eligible. When they get educated, when they learn to be wiser, then they can vote. Then again liberals could pull of the same thing.

Individuals part of organizations that are openly hostile to our way of life such as the Communist party, the Nazi Party, the Ku Klux Klan, Islamic Jihad, La Raza, Mecha and other trash should also not get to vote. Instead they should be considered dangerous individuals and a threat to freedom. There is a way to differentiate between which group is not of that criteria. Keep in mind I'm talking people who are openly hostile to us and our way of doing things. I'm not talking about people who show some leftist views that some people disagree with like Food not bombs or the council of conservative citizens or some other nutcase groups. They can vote if they are eligible. Were talking people who openly hate us and preach for our destruction. In the olden days communists and other people couldn't vote or work in government. We should go back to that.

Finally people who commit certain crimes should not be permitted to vote. People who are dishonest, who are unscrupulous and who harm innocent people should be barred for a long period or for the rest of their lives. A lot of felons don't want law abiding citizens to be armed or to be protected by the law. The reason criminals have more rights is because we let them vote for evil people who want to "understand them" or "have sympathy for them."

Please keep in mind this is not totally full proof. We planned this out to be fair and decent in allowing those who are qualified to vote without allowing for loopholes for evil to use to take away someones freedom. But if we did use this, we would have better people in office, less taxes, more freedom and more jobs while people like the stupid woman I mentioned would be staying in their public housing on election day fuming about Ronnie McBushitler, complaining that America is the worst place in the world, and how people of different races and backgrounds are of Satan.

In Conclusion, some sort of system must be in place to prevent America from descending into socialist despotism. Although it must be done carefuly.